hal tweets ·7:42 AM

A short piece I wrote for AOLnews about why Peep culture trumps privacy online. http://bit.ly/bQECsC

Peep The Game

Susan Boyle’s Got Peep

Posted by: Hal
Tags: blogging, surveillance, exposure, news, personal, peep-the-game

So what’s the one thing we know about overnight Scottish singing sensation Susan Boyle? What’s the one fact that resonates with all of us? Answer: It’s that she’s NEVER BEEN KISSED. This is the source of our fascination with her. We relate to this, it makes us feel better about ourselves - if she can make it, anyone can make it! The fact that she is homely just makes the story - her story - even better. If she was pretty, she’d be just another performer. The back story of her personal life would be typical and un-exciting. But here’s a person who is plain in every way, a person so plain she’s NEVER BEEN KISSED and yet now the whole world knows her name. That’s what we like about her, and that’s why she is really a great peep (as opposed to pop) culture figure.

Boylethumbsupjpg

Consider this piece in the Washington Post, one of many running all over the world. The piece goes out of its way to keep the myth alive. It paints a nice caricature of a lonely lovely lady – a Hollywood caricature in every possible way – except that it happens to be true. Boyle really is the youngest of nine children, she really is a 47 year-old unemployed, slightly chubby woman who’s never dated and never married and never been kissed, who lives alone with her cat, who, until recently, was the subject of mockery by the village youth.

Who is Susan Boyle and what goes on her mind and how is her insta-fame going to help or hinder her in the coming days and years? On that, the piece gives us nothing. But on the cliche of Susan Boyle, anti-celebrity celebrity for the Peep age, the article is resplendent with quote after quote from the towns people, all too willing to weigh in: “We’re all tired of 23-year-old models trying to sing on TV. Susan is a 47-year-old spinster who, by God, can sing,” Michael Nicolson, 64, the bingo caller at the community center where Boyle volunteers, tells us.  “She’s an ordinary, run-of-the-mill lady,” says Joe Stronach, the bowling club office (whatever the hell a bowling club officer is). “She doesn’t have great looks, but God gave her a wonderful voice.” Susan Boyle’s Got PEEP baby! Boy does she ever.

The move from pop culture to peep culture opens the door to all kinds of insta-celebrity random moments. When you are deriving your entertainment from the lives of other ‘ordinary’ people, it doesn’t really matter what their talent necessarily is, what matters is that there’s a peep back story we can all buy into. In the case of the Spinster Songster, it’s not the song and the singing that interests and amuses us, it’s the folksy story, it’s the life that seems tailor made for reality tv and its many peep spin offs. They set her up to be a loser but she proved them wrong. And now the pudgy village spinster with the learning disability is crazy famous. She’s like a movie, only she’s real.

 

Comments: -7-, Add yours…

 

 

OctoDad Does Bad Deed

Posted by: Hal
Tags: blogging, surveillance, exposure, news, personal, peep-the-game, hals-life

An “exclusive” in US Magazine has confirmed that Jon, the dad in reality tv show Jon & Kate Plus 8 (about a couple with 8 kids), had an affair with a school teacher named Deanna. It’s all classic peep – guy elevated to celeb status because he is the subject of a reality series, then finds out what comes along with being a celeb: having all parts of your life be used as entertainment for others, not just the family friendly stuff you think is going to end up on tv. That’s the nature of the peep beast: it keeps going, whether you like it or not. (By the way, today’s theme is reality tv: I’ve got another post coming up this afternoon on the topic.)

So before we end with the obligatory array of Jon and Kate exposed by US Magazine crap that’s all over the web (accompanied of course by thousands of comments – is jon a bad dad? are the couple a sham? did the pressure drive jon to drink and cheat?) let me just say this: poor kids. Eventually they will grow up and have to deal with not just their parents, but with half the world having access to a permanent record of their wacky, weird and not necessarily all that happy childhood. Remind me, when did they sign up for that exactly?

And now the crap:

Jonkatevideostillstill from the video featuring dad jon exiting apparent mistress’s house in the AM through back door. what, did they camp out there all night to get this 6 seconds of video? of course they did!

Jonkateuspicsnice spread of peep photos US!

and finally, a sampling of the 94 comments appended to an article that ran yesterday in the Vancouver Sun with the headline: Jon and Kate Plus 8: Kate Gosselin calls husband’s behaviour “irresponsible”

Maria B: Maybe I’m very naive, but if these kids had common associates, it just boggles my mind that in the last few weeks they started getting deeper involved instead of realizing that 2 kids just like them have just died and they need to stop doing what they are doing before they end up dead as well. I just don’t get why that wasn’t a wake up call for them.
   
Anonymous: You people are Pigs!
 
Anonymous: Shame on all of you for watching this crap that profits from the exploitation of children!  
   
An Asian Guy: Reading some of your stupid commments makes me PRAY that I never have children with a horrible north america women like all of you pigs!
   
That fat lady sang long ago: It’s common knowledge that they are over, and have been for almost a year now, he’s had SEVERAL flings throughout their marriage, he’s just becomming less discreet about them. No wonder Kate is on the edge all the time!! Jon is effectively exposing this sham marraige for what it’s worth with his “indiscretions,” and his actions are threatening to expose them for the frauds they are! No way is this “religious, god-fearing” couple, who purposely brought all these “little faces” into the world and built their fortune on the guise of family values and God and perfection and lies, ever going to admit they are over! NO WAY will they give up all that $$$ or book deals or fame or their (network paid-for) mansion. Not to mention, imagine the public backlash they’ll receive when they actually do admit they are over, admitting its all a sham, and destroying these babies lives as they know them?? They would rather die than admit it. Greed? Saving Face? “Religion?” Who knows or cares really. Garbage “reality” tv that is in fact scripted with babies exploited daily for ratings and $$. They should pull the show and be investigated by child services! But alas, no, instead they’ll use this to their advantage and just get richer—The Gosselins Go To Marriage Counselling: the power to overcome “real life” obstacles with family and prayer….watch for it PS: what is wrong with the world when 8 lil babies IN NEED can’t even get free diapers or “sponsored”, yet these lying posers are filthy rich??? It makes me sick!!
   
 
Shelby: I am a mom of a 3 year old and feel like I become critical at times and feel like I am going to lose my mind. I can’t begin to imagine the stress on both Jon and Kate with having 8 children and multiples at that….I think if we all try to empathize instead of judge, we will realize that they are doing the very best that they can. They are in my prayers!
   
Larry: Jon should pick up the phone and call Hulk Hogan for martial advice.

Comments: -0-, Add yours…

 

 

Lawsuits foiled by Facebook Pics

Posted by: Hal
Tags: blogging, surveillance, exposure, news, personal, peep-the-game, hals-life

Article in the Globe and Mail and elsewhere via Canadian Press about people who get into legal trouble because of what they post to Facebook. Actually these incidents have been going on for at least the last 3 years so I’m not sure why CP and the G&M decided to run this piece now. I guess people screwing up their own lawsuits is an original twist on what is becoming a familiar story. In the book, I write about a bunch of cases including the story of the poster boy for this phenomenon, Joshua Lipton. Lipton is the Rhode Island college student who seriously injured a woman while driving drunk. His claims of guilt and repentance were cast in doubt when prosecutors showed the judge photos culled from his Facebook page showing him at a Halloween party dressed in an orange jump suit emblazoned with the words “jail bird”.

Lipton2_20090127074623_320_240

Comments: -2-, Add yours…

 

 

Peeping Farrah Fawcett’s Death

Posted by: Hal
Tags: blogging, surveillance, exposure, news, personal, peep-the-game, hals-life

9 million viewers tuned in to watch Farrah Fawcett dying of cancer, which makes Farrah, according to some commentators, our Jade Goody. 

Goody, you probably recall, was the British Reality TV star best known (until her resurgence courtesy of cancer) for racist comments spewed on Big Brother All Stars UK.

Goody, like Farrah, went with the televised death route. (Said Goody: “I’ve lived my whole adult life talking about my life. The only difference is that I’m talking about my death now. It’s OK.”) General reaction to the decision of Goody and Farrah to televise their dying has been knee-jerk: it’s courageous and brave. (“‘Farrah’s Story’ a tale of inner strength,” said MSNBC.) Plus they do it to raise awareness of “insert type of cancer here”.

This, of course, is nonsense. If Fawcett wanted to raise awareness of the rare form of cancer that will soon take her life, there are a lot better ways to do it than make a reality tv movie-of-the-week described by the New York Times as “awful because it was an exploitative portrait of a celebrity’s fight with cancer.”

The Times critique continues: “... NBC took Ms. Fawcett’s candid video diary and allowed it to be packaged as a generic VH1 ‘Behind the Music’ biography — maudlin music, gauzy slow-motion film, and pseudo-revealing interviews with friends, coworkers, doctors and hairdressers reminiscing about a former star.”

I’m fascinated by the way Peep Culture is changing our approach to death. (This deserves much longer consideration…I’d like to find a venue interested in a longer piece on this.) In Peep, death, once consigned to the shadows, it’s now the last frontier of spot light entertainment. If somebody’s slow lingering death can be packaged into mainstream corporate entertainment, then, let’s face it, anything can be packaged and turned into televised product. Plus the dying have a marketing advantage: no matter how good or bad it is, people will tune in because they know it’s the grand finale.

This isn’t Farrah Fawcett’s first foray into Reality TV. Nor was Jade Goody’s 3 part mini-series long goodbye some neophyte attempt to break into the business and fulfill a final dream. In fact, Goody publically stated her desire to milk every last drop of her fame to earn as much money as possible for her family before she died. (It’s like Walt in Breaking Bad – anything is permissible if you’re dying and doing it for your family.) 

In the end, these are seasoned veterans of the small screen who can’t, won’t or don’t want to let go of the limelight.  

“She deserves a different, less exploitative television tribute,” the New York Times said of Farrah’s special. I’m not sure she does.

Fawcett

 

Comments: -9-, Add yours…

 

 

Is Surveillance Worth the Social Cost? Article in the National Post

Posted by: Hal
Tags: blogging, surveillance, exposure, news, personal, peep-the-game, peep-radio, hals-life, peep-the-documentary

Here’s a really interesting and well written article, complete with a healthy dose of snark and skepticism. The piece is called Are We All Big Brother Now? and, written by one of newspaper’s news reporters, a guy who spends plenty of time on the crime beat, it has a refreshing no nonsense look at the ideas I espouse in my book.

Here are two paragraphs from the piece:

As such, the flawed footage was typical of how CCTV plays out in major crimes, as a crucial but incomplete piece of the puzzle. But the other factors, especially the frantic speculation about the case on dedicated Facebook sites, also typify an emerging culture of democratized digital surveillance, in which security and entertainment have blurred into voyeurism, usually with the narcissistic consent of the surveilled.

This “Peep Culture,” according to Toronto author Hal Niedzviecki, is what happens when pop culture’s mass audience gains the tools to display themselves online as celebrities, with their private lives on enthusiastic display. But with time, it spreads beyond the time-passing frivolity of social networking into the most deadly serious corners of the culture.”

I liked the way this piece approached, without any sentimentality, the question of whether or not surveillance and self surveillance are worth the price that we ultimately have to pay as individuals and a society.

Are we all Big Brother now-_1243260481038

Comments: -4-, Add yours…

 

 

Page 1 of 6 | 1 2 3 >  Last »

The Bloggist

Hey, I’m Hal Niedzviecki. I’m a writer/thinker who lives in Toronto, Ontario, Canada with my wife and daughter. Up till now I’ve always considered myself a private person. But at the same time I’m fascinated by people who effortlessly open themselves up to the whole world. So I’ve… more...

 

Twitter

A short piece I wrote for AOLnews about why Peep culture trumps privacy online. http://bit.ly/bQECsC

Hal Niedzviecki :: ·7:42AM

New content on the Broken Pencil website! Short fiction: Shack the Clam Girl + How to Make Your Own Game Cabinet http://bit.ly/b6CHLP

Hal Niedzviecki :: ·15:55PM

 

Tag Cloud

 

 

Archive Months

August, 2010
July, 2010
June, 2010
April, 2010
March, 2010
February, 2010